Sunday 10 September 2006

10-Sep-2006 - Prof. JRG Furnell REPORT

Astonishingly this man saw himself as morally and ethically fit to 'Report' on this matter in the light of the fact that he had accepted social hospitality from Hamish Grossart and his extended family, having his expenses paid to holiday with them in France!

One would have thought that an ethical man would have prorogued himself.

There are in fact two Reports.
The first report prepared by Furnell was late as would seem to be always in his case and he charged a further £4,000!

His excuse was that he had not typing capacity.
I checked with his secretary and she confirmed that he had not passed the document in. 
Seemingly it was just a way of getting further funds.

There are many Sheriffs and lawyers and indeed other child psychologists who have intimated to me that he is just after the green money.

A further Supplementary report was prepared and I will email.

I gave you the letter which I wrote in strong terms to Scott Cochrane of Brodies stating my utter disgust that he did not act in an "independent' manner.

He went to France to interview the children and took hospitality from HG and the extended family! He interviewed the grandparents, the aunt and half sisters. He however did not accord the same respect towards me.

He came to interview on three separate occasions each time arriving 1hour, 2.5 and 3 hours late respectively. He did not interview any one except the Au Pair living with me at that time.

Grossly and disgustingly imbalanced and biased, in my opinion.

His manner towards me was unprofessional haughty, arrogant and quite frankly rude.

On his last visit to me when asked why he was late when he was only 10 minutes down the road he faked a demeaning "feint" that he should be asked.

His whole approach was seemingly offensive, unprofessional and indicated a fraudalent behaviour.

Regards

Elaine

Prof. James R. G. Furnell
M.A. D.C.P. Ph.D. LL.B. DIP. L.P. F.B.P.S. C.Psychol
Consultant Psychologist
Consulting at
Abbey King’s Park Hospital, Polmaise Road,
Stirling, FK7 9PU
Tel: 01786 451669 Fax: 01786 465296

Our Ref: JF/AW 10th September 2006

For the attention of: the Clerk of Court to Lord G. Glennie
The Court of Session
Parliament House
Edinburgh EH1 1RF

cc: For the attention of: G. Leonard Mair Esq.
Morton Fraser
Solicitors
30-31 Queen Street
Edinburgh EH2 1JX

cc: For the attention of: Scott Cochrane Esq.
Brodies
Solicitors
15 Atholl Crescent
Edinburgh EH3 8HA

Court of Session, Edinburgh
Elaine Rosalind MacKenzie Simpson or Grossart -v- Hamish Macleod Grossart
The Children: Ruairidh Sholto Grossart (d.o.b. 8th January 1998) and
Rosalind Sophie MacKenzie Grossart (d.o.b. 20th November 2000).
Court Reference: F72/06


This Report has been prepared in response to Court of Session Interlocutor dated 16th June 2006 which ..................


REMOVED at the request of the children's Mother out of concern for her two minor children and her ex-husband's two adult daughters, who she brought up from a very young age to relative maturity for her ex-husband as he had so damaged his first wife that the duty fell to his new partner.

One can see the same pattern being attempted here.

The malign and dishonest bullying and fear of losing control is not unusual in narcissism it seems.

This reaches, in some cases and this may prove to be one, the level where the Narcissistic Male in his gross insecurity and inadequacy takes the stance of 'if I can't have you no one will'.
This is the extreme manifestation seen in stalkers and particularly men without the moral fibre or strength of personality to cope with their rejection as they set out to destroy those who are unwilling to succumb to the control they determine to excercise.

Such behaviour is nothing more than a manifestation of evil hidden in braggadocio and determination to bend all to their will - in this case with willing lawyers all too willing to feather their nests the Father is determined to strip his wife of dignity, maternity, money and if he can achieve it again sanity!

Hamish Grossart is in my opinion a disgusting excrescence of a man - a total emotional failure incapable of standing on his own feet and within days of separation if not before seeking out his next victim - I regret I can see his latest marque Plum Sterling and her children as nothing more than his next victim in a trail of inadequacy that will continue until his decrepitude leaves him either with some sad woman he has bought or in abject isolation - rarely do the children of such unfortunates rally round seeing the loss of control as their long awaited liberty freeing them from the fear and hatred they have suffered all their lives!

Please be assured that Elaine Grossart hasn't a clue who is posting this blog and clearly she has made extensive efforts, including someone with IT skills who has charged for his services to identify the author.

Be assured there has been absolutely no visible effort on the part of Hamish Grossart to contact me, nor have any of the army of parasitic lawyers he employs to harrass his wife and children.

I do note as a result of one of my informants leaking material from his lawyer's offices (well where do you think I get much of this info!) I gather a main plank of the nasty little man's latest efforts to continue the damage to those who once upon a time respected him in his profligate and irresponsible, venal and vile abuse of the law to buy the result he wants making a mockery of Sheriffs, lawyers and the Courts and a farce of any meaning of the word Justice is to try to pretend that Elaine Grossart is responsible for this blog.

The logic being I presume that http://gross-art.blogspot.com/ is posted by Hamish Grossart because it is titled after him! One has to marvel at the buffoon's logic that he seeks to convince a Scotish Court that his pack of lies is true. Why would I not be surprised when he succeeds when it is so apparent Justice is no more than a commodity in Scotland where verdicts would seem to be bought and sold like Papal Pardons in return for the largesse of the corrupt Lawyers, Banks and Politicians with the £Millions so readily available over many years from corrupt bankers oils the entire Satanic horror show that is the arcane and malign mysogenistic and Masonic septic tank that is Scotland.

It may be apposite at this stage to ask how vermin like Hamish Grossart gain their power see: http??TheSSoE.blogspot.com and ponder the relationships shown and those yet to be exposed.

Explain perhaps how an affinity between Grossart and the apparently ignoble family bank can claim probity when their affilitations would seem to stretch from the now bankrupted RBS to such as financial advice seemingly given to Murray International who seemingly owna hugely indebted footbal team of little asset value and masquerade as steel stock holders - I say masquerade as it does look much as if one would need to bury Scotland knee deep in steel to justify what seems to be a BASE RATE fixed interest £1 Billion loan - I wonder if the fees garnered there would bear scrutiny or is this back to £Multi Million bankers' bonuses and how these charlatans steal the money!

I speak glibly of a £Billion!
A.
A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

B.
A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

C.
A billion hours ago our ancestors were living in the Stone Age.

D.
A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.

A £Billion lent to a single firm with no visible substance to justify it from a bank that was bankrupted by the £Multi Millionaires in whose stewardship it was entrusted!


Do not overlook the irrefutable fact that Elaine Grossart was granted a divorce on the grounds of abuse, sexual assault, physical and mental abuse and much more damning evidence in the public domain - her divorce was against the vile, duplicitous, self serving, mean, bullying and narcissistic Hamish Grossart who is now BUYING the Courts with money defrauded from his ex-wife since he was penniless and borrowed money from her when they first met!

Do YOU believe that Hamish Grossart is a fit and proper person to be allowed to go amongst the public unsupervised let alone have custody at ANY time of young children - a man who it has been attested and accepted in Court beat his wife to the ground and urinated on her! A man who exposed himself erect and naked to his young daughter, a man who is a serial adulterter wife beater and abuser.

However much money this egregious piece of filth has should he be in a position to BUY his will from Courts corrupted by their deference to money, status, males and the Masons? I wonder howmany of the people in the Court will have a link and debt to each other through The Masons, The Spec. or similar I hazard a guess that Elaine Grossart will thus be clearly disadvantaged!

Filth like Hamish Grossart all too often are able gratuitously to abuse women and children as does Hamish Grossart.

Thursday 15 June 2006

EG ROLE IN BRINGING UP CHILDREN

EG ROLE IN BRINGING UP CHILDREN

From a very early stage in our relationship before we got married I was involved with bringing up Mhoraig and Cathleen.

Hamish and I experienced many problems with Fiona over the well-being and care of the girls. Hamish was keen that I take over as soon as possible. He organised for me to meet with them very shortly after taking on the rent of Easter Belmont, Edinburgh.

When we were living at Easter Belmont I regularly took them on outings, had their friends play, took them to their friends and collected them.

West Court – Newton

I basically looked after Mhoraig and Cathleen on my own. Hamish was away on business, either in Stoke-on-Trent (Royal Doulton) or abroad. I had help with the children on part-time basis as I did not want to drive to Kilgraston, Perthshire with Ruairidh (a small baby at the time – 45 minute journey each way). We agreed to get some help. I employed a 18 year by the name of Jennifer Slee. She was delightful and stayed with us for 18 months. I sometimes drove to school and she sometimes drove to school. I had a lady help for 2 hours a week and I maintained the house. I kept the garden and occasionally had help.

The girls often had friends from South Queensberry to play and stay overnight. We had weekly visits from Hamish’s mother and father (in particular his mother).

I attended to all the girls needs:

Took them to the doctor when necesassary;
Hospital visits
Arranged their activities
Wellfare – hair, shopping
Washing
Helped with homework, project work
All aspect of school work – other requirements from school
Collection from Fiona’s – Hamish did in fact help out from time to time
Holidays in Tiree – all organisation
Visits to inlaws and my parents and family

Sunday 30 April 2006

HISTORY OF MY RELATIONSHIP WITH HAMISH PRIOR TO MARRIAGE

HISTORY OF MY RELATIONSHIP WITH HAMISH PRIOR TO MARRIAGE

Hamish and I first met at a Fine Art Exihibition in Edinburgh in 1996. There were a number of other occasions were our paths crossed, Bourne Fine Art, Bank Receptions etc. At one stage I briefly met him when I was working at Cala Homes in Colinton Road, Edinburgh and also when I worked at Adam & Company, Charlotte Square Edinburgh. I believe he had an office in the basement of 22 Charlotte Square which was above Adam & Company. I was not aware that his office was there until a few years later.

In mid 1987 I applied for a job with First Northern (company run by three directors, Hamish being one of them) based at 46 Charlotte Square, Edinburgh. I was initially interviewed by Michael Livingston and then by Hamish. I was offered the job and worked with First Northern at Charlotte Square, Edinburgh. During that time we developed a good relationship but not close. There were a few occasions when he asked me to work after the normal working time and I obliged. Gradually we grew fonder of each other. I was living with my long term partner at that time. Hamish was living at 13 Comely Bank Road. His wife Fiona had given birth to Mhoraig and when I met Hamish I should think she was 4-6 months old. He would often comment on how disorganised Fiona was and that she was not a good mother. He used to explain that she was unable to cook, look after the house and would not listen to his or any of his family’s advice on any issues pertaining to the children or the state of the house. I suppose you could say that I did believe all the various problems he was encountering.

On one occasion (October 1987) Hamish was shooting in the Borders and arrived at my house (North Lodge, Cringletie, Nr Eddleston, Peeblesshire) unannounced carrying a brace of pheasants. He was greeted by my then partner Ian Carr. I was a little surprised and so was my partner at the time. We have polite conversation and he expressed an interest in the garden and surrounding land so Ian kindly gave him a guided tour.

Hamish organised a family holiday (August 1987) and during that time he telephoned me to check on the state of play in the office, mail, messages etc. At the same time he would ask how I was and that he was missing me. He referred to the fact that when he returned he would be slimmer, tanned and would I wish to see him soon. I agreed that I too was looking forward to seeing him.

Several weeks after he returned from holiday I invited him for dinner in Eddleston . I am not entirely sure who suggested meeting at the house (North Lodge) and then going on to dinner. After dinner we came back to North Lodge for coffee. I think that was the first time we actually became intimate with each other.

Our affair began very slowly. Sometimes we would meet for dinner in Edinburgh and sometimes we liaised in the office. We both kept in touch with each other regularly on the phone. You could say it was all part of the ‘chase’. Hamish often asked me to phone him either at the office or even when he was on business in London, Belfast or even abroad.

He began to feel trapped with his marriage and explained that he never loved his wife and that she in fact never loved him. She only married him because as he puts it ‘he was a good prospect’. He believed that this was the biggest mistake he had made.

I will always remember Hamish proposing to me out of the blue in an Indian Restaurant (Leith,1987) He asked me if I was willing to ‘take a risk’ and would I prepared to ‘wait’. The reason he gave was that he wished to prepare the way with the children and wished to see then as often as possible. He also had to agree a settlement and then put all the arrangements in place before we could actually make any firm plans. This seemed entirely reasonable. My feelings for him were very strong and I was taken by surprise at his proposal. I thought it was not really quite the right thing to do whilst still married but I understood his depth of feelings and was deeply touched. We discussed this at great length and I agreed that I was willing to wait for him but that I did not want to be the reason for the ‘break-up’ and that he must be quite sure as he had a small daughter and she was so young. He explained that Fiona (former wife) had not wished children yet and that he had persuaded her to have a child and that she was not competent. He described his feelings more akin to ‘brothers to sisters’.

After some time our relationship at work was proving to be awkward for him. He explained that I should leave EFT formally First Northern Corporate because it was in his interests and mine – Fiona was also putting a lot of pressure on Hamish and threatening to leave him with Mhoraig or so he said.

I refused to leave unless I had another job to go to. One reason for this is that I owned a flat in Edinburgh in the Colonies (Stockbridge) and I also had other commitments at home. I did not feel it was fair just to hand in my notice until I had found suitable employment. I may add that Hamish asked me to move into my colonies flat so that I may be close to him but I refused on the grounds that it was too close for comfort and easy for him to flit back and forward. [I can’t remember at what point this came up but I did in fact point out that it woud be better to sort things out at home and extract himself without involvement from me so that it would be clear cut and that it would be better for his wife and children. In other words he must make the decision himself . He one pointed out that he would have left his wife eventually and that it was only a matter of time and that meeting me only brought it home more quickly than he had expected] Hamish offered and indeed promised to try and ‘fix me up with a job’. This did not materialise. Eventually he summoned me into the board room and explained that I was indeed going to leave the company and that he would pay me three months salary. I felt I could not continue to work there and agreed to leave.

I managed to gain employment at Dundas & Wilson (1988 ish) Hamish continued to keep in touch with me. I had at that point decided to try and detach myself from him as I felt he had to try and repair his marriage and felt it was far better to keep my distance. This was difficult for me as I was so very fond of him. Some of Hamish’s calls would be put over the loud speaker system in D & W reception . I received all calls. During this time we did not actually meet up - only contact by telephone.

Some 18 months or so passed we kept periodically. I set up a small business in Peebles and decided to continue my relationship with Ian. I began to receive telephone calls and then they became more frequent.

On 27 May 1989 I received a rather distressed call from Hamish asking if I could meet at the Braid Hills Hotel in Fairmilehead, Edinburgh. We met and talked. It was lovely to seem him again and I have to say I have always been attracted to him physically. It transpired that Fiona was about to give birth (Cathleen) and that he was not entirely happy with this prospect. I tried to console him by telling him he was a good father. He explained that he did not think it was his child and then subsequently told me he had been plyed with wine and that he did not want another child by Fiona and that he felt trapped. I said that is past now and that he must try and love her and that everything would be fine and to really try and repair the situation. He felt that Fiona and manipulated the situation. This has been a bone of contention for many years with us. I have always said to him he could also have said no to any form of physical relationship if he wanted and that they were both responsible for this child coming into this world.

Some time passed and Hamish I resumed our relationship. I travelled down to London on a few occasions. We met at various placed in and around Edinburgh, and the Borders.
He would phone me at my home and asked me to phone him at home or would give me various numbers to call.

He would call me to say that he was in the vicinity would I like to meet up. Sometimes we would meet in Peebles when he was shooting at Barnes (Near Manor Water, Peeblesshire). I met Robert MacNeil (owner of Kincardine Estate, Auchterarder Estate, godparents to Rosalind) there (1990). Sometimes he would tell me he was staying overnight in Cringletie Hotel which was only 2 minute walk from our cottage and would like to meet.